Modified Numerals and Split Disjunction: The First-Order Case
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract We present a number of puzzles arising for the interpretation modified numerals. Following Büring and others we assume that main difference between comparative superlative modifiers is only latter convey disjunctive meanings. further argue inference patterns triggered by disjunction are hard to capture in existing semantic pragmatic analyses these phenomena (neo-Gricean or grammatical alike), propose novel account inferences framework bilateral state-based modal logic defining first order extension Aloni (Semant Pragmat 15:5-EA, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.15.5 )’s .
منابع مشابه
Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction: First-Order Semantics and Expressiveness
Logic programs with ordered disjunction (LPODs) (Brewka 2002) generalize normal logic programs by combining alternative and ranked options in the heads of rules. It has been showed that LPODs are useful in a number of areas including game theory, policy languages, planning and argumentations. In this paper, we extend propositional LPODs to the first-order case, where a classical second-order fo...
متن کاملModified Numerals as Post-Suppositions
The paper provides a compositional account of cumulative readings with non-increasing modified numerals (aka van Benthem’s puzzle), e.g., Exactly three boys saw exactly five movies. The main proposal is that modified numerals make two kinds of semantic contributions. Their asserted/at-issue contribution is a maximization operator that introduces the maximal set of entities that satisfies their ...
متن کاملTwo kinds of modified numerals
In this article, I show that there are two kinds of numeral modifiers: (Class A) those that express the comparison of a certain cardinality with the value expressed by the numeral and (Class B) those that express a bound on a degree property. The goal is, first of all, to provide empirical evidence for this claim and second to account for these data within a framework that treats modified numer...
متن کاملOrder Bias and the Suppositional Disjunction
We present a suppositional theory of disjunctive reasoning that proposes that ‘either-or’, like ‘if’, triggers hypothetical thinking. However, disjunctions are more complex as they require the reasoner to consider two hypotheses, violating the singularity principle. Hence one of the disjuncts becomes focal – the first one in the absence of conversational cues. As predicted, participants present...
متن کاملMeasure Phrase Equatives and Modified Numerals
In English, equatives can be formed with a numeral or measure phrase (MP) standard (e.g. John can dive as deep as 500m; Rett, 2010). These ‘measure phrase equatives’ (MPEs) differ semantically from their clausal counterparts (e.g. John can dive as deep as Sue can) in two important ways. First, while clausal standards set lower bounds, resulting in an ‘at least’ interpretation of the equative, M...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Logic, Language and Information
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1572-9583', '0925-8531']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-023-09399-w